Private digital intelligence unit
Internet Intelligence Service produces digital intelligence, cyber exposure and due diligence reports for individuals, executives, companies and advisers. We locate useful information, verify it, place it in context and turn it into practical options, using only lawful sources and client-supplied material.
Doctrine
We turn public traces, weak signals, web history, already visible leaks, social networks, registers, indexed content and reputation anomalies into a clear view of risk. A single search result is never enough: information is traced to its origin, dated, compared with other sources and placed within the wider timeline.
Our approach prioritises rigour, discretion, evidence preservation, competing hypotheses and a clear separation between established fact, credible signal and unresolved possibility. The final brief is written for decision-makers: what is known, what remains uncertain and what action is reasonable now.
Data & qualification
A volume of search results is not intelligence. Every useful element is linked to its origin, dated, corroborated and assessed before it reaches the final brief. This model separates established facts, signals requiring confirmation and unresolved gaps.
Every conclusion retains a review path to the material that supports it and states its limitations explicitly.
Bars show the relative place of each family in this visual model, not a volume of client data.
2025 public data
Three complementary official scopes: events handled in France, incidents analysed across the European Union and assistance requests from French audiences. These figures describe different populations and should not be added together.
How to read: data published by the cited organisations and accessed on 24 August 2026. Definitions of an event, incident and assistance request differ between sources. Changes are those reported by the source organisations.
Capabilities
Every mission begins with strict scoping: legitimate purpose, authorised perimeter, lawful sources, confidentiality level and expected deliverables. This first stage removes irrelevant noise, identifies the questions that matter and limits collection to information that can genuinely help the client.
Mapping of identities, aliases and public assets across domains, social profiles, publications, archives and accessible registers. Relationships are documented with confidence levels so that a possible connection is never overstated.
Monitoring of public exposure, already visible leaks, impersonation, typosquatting and hostile mentions. Findings are ranked by urgency and translated into practical defensive priorities.
Structured risk analysis before partnerships, sensitive hires, investments, acquisitions or disputes. The report compares stated claims with public facts, meaningful inconsistencies and questions that still require direct confirmation.
Support with scams, harassment, impersonation, blackmail, damaged reputation or a worrying online relationship. Available traces are organised into a timeline to clarify events and preserve useful evidence.
Narrative analysis, relay mapping, manipulation signals and assessment of the visible media footprint. The report distinguishes an isolated criticism from a lasting dynamic and recommends a proportionate response.
Rapid initial assessment, a verified timeline, urgency levels and a clear action plan for executives, legal teams, communications advisers or families facing an active situation.
Protocol
We define the objective, legitimate purpose, urgency, people concerned, useful perimeter and legal limits before research begins.
Relevant open sources, registers, search engines, archives, networks and specialist monitoring are consulted, with links and dates preserved for review.
Information is sorted, corroborated and assigned a confidence level. Competing explanations and blind spots remain visible whenever the evidence is incomplete.
The report combines a verified timeline, supporting evidence, ranked risks, an executive summary and recommended actions that can be prioritised immediately.
Frequently asked questions
It collects and corroborates lawfully accessible information from search engines, registers, archives, websites, social platforms and client-supplied material. The work checks origin, date, consistency and relevance while excluding intrusion, private interception and access-control circumvention.
A mission can help before a sensitive decision, partnership, hire, investment or acquisition, and when fraud, impersonation, harassment, reputation damage or a digital crisis makes it important to establish a reliable timeline. Initial scoping confirms whether open-source research can provide a useful answer.
Depending on the mission, it includes a decision brief, a timeline, dated sources and confidence levels, ranked risks, unresolved questions and recommended actions. The summary supports quick reading while the detailed sections preserve the evidence and reasoning.
Confidential channel
